ACP-PIER, which provides evidence-based guidance for clinical care, gives the following recommendations:
- Individualize decisions to convert an endotracheal tube to a tracheostomy based on anticipated duration of mechanical ventilation and patient-centered factors.
- Realize that, although full consensus does not exist, earlier tracheostomy may be associated with a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay.
After summarizing the evidence ACP-PIER comments “…trials offer no high quality data on the subject.”
In light of the inconclusive evidence Bradley D. Freeman in the June 2008 isse of Critical Care Medicine describes how: “A standardized approach in which the decision for tracheostomy is based on objective measures of weaning performance may be a means of using this procedure more consistently and effectively.” Included in the article is the actual protocol and tracheostomy consult note.
Freeman BD and others. Tracheostomy protocol: experience with development and potential utility. Critical Care Medicine 2008 June; 36(6)1742-1748. PMID 18496369.
In the same issue of Critical Care Medicine the editorial “Tracheostomy protocol compliance: herding cats?*” discusses Bradley Freeman’s protocol article. While acknowledging the preliminary nature of the study and the problems inherent getting physicians to adopt protocols, the commenter suggests that “this may be may be just the breakthough we need to use tracheostomy in a more consistent and effective fashion.”
Liu L. Tracheostomy protocol compliance: herding cats?* Critical Care Medicine2008 June; 36(6):1959-1960. PMID 18520851
For more information, please check this PubMed search of selected articles from 2005 to date.
PMID: 18496369
Posted by mosaic123